NCAR Resarch Data Archive logo

Comparison of CAMS and CMAQ analyses of surface-level PM2.5 and O3 over the conterminous United States (CONUS)

d315001
| DOI: 10.5065/EVBW-7805
 
Abstract:

In this study, we compare the performance of the analysis time series over the period of August 2020 to December 2021 at EPA AirNow stations for both PM2.5 and O3 from raw Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) reanalyses (CAMS RA Raw), raw CAMS near real-time forecasts (CAMS FC Raw), raw near real-time Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) forecasts (CMAQ FC Raw), bias-corrected CAMS forecasts (CAMS FC BC), and bias-corrected CMAQ forecasts (CMAQ FC BC). This 17-month period spans two wildfire seasons, to assess model analysis performance in high-end AQ events. In addition to determining the best-performing gridded product, this process allows us to benchmark the performance of CMAQ forecasts against other global datasets (CAMS reanalysis and forecasts). For both PM2.5 and O3, the bias correction algorithm employed here greatly improved upon the raw model time series, and CMAQ FC BC was the best-performing model analysis time series, having the lowest RMSE, smallest bias error, and largest critical success index at multiple thresholds.

Temporal Range:
2020-08 to 2021-12
Variables:
Particulate Matter (pm 2.5) Tropospheric Ozone
Data Types:
Grid
Data Contributors:
UCO/CIRES
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado
 |  DOC/NOAA/OAR/ESRL/PSL
Physical Sciences Laboratory, Earth System Research Laboratory, OAR, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce
 |  UCAR/NCAR/RAL
Research Application Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
Publications:
Lee, J. A., S. Alessandrini, J.-H. Kim, S. Meech, R. Kumar, I. V. Djalalova, and J. M. Wilczak, 2024: Comparison of CAMS and CMAQ analyses of surface-level PM2.5 and O3 over the conterminous United States (CONUS). Atmos. Environ., 338, 120833 (DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2024.120833).
Total Volume:
125.42 GB
Data Formats:
HDF5/NetCDF4
Metadata Record:
Data License:
Citation counts are compiled through information provided by publicly-accessible APIs according to the guidelines developed through the https://makedatacount.org/ project. If journals do not provide citation information to these publicly-accessible services, then this citation information will not be included in RDA citation counts. Additionally citations that include dataset DOIs are the only types included in these counts, so legacy citations without DOIs, references found in publication acknowledgements, or references to a related publication that describes a dataset will not be included in these counts.